Each channel change requires a new connection. Some players reuse connections. Others reopen every time.
A British IPTV reseller whose player uses persistent connections (HTTP keep-alive, connection reuse) changes channels faster. A British IPTV provider whose player opens a new connection for every channel adds handshake overhead each time.
Here's the speed optimisation: connection reuse saves round trips. The IPTV reseller UK who implements it respects that reopening connections wastes time. One without adds delay to every channel change.
In most cases, what actually works is rapid channel changing. If changes are consistently under 1 second, persistent connections likely help. If every change has variable delay, new connections each time.
Scenario: you're channel surfing. On Player A, each change is fast. On Player B, some changes are fast, some slow. Player B may be opening new connections.
I've watched an IPTV reseller UK enable HTTP keep-alive. Channel change consistency improved. Customers noticed fewer slow changes.
Honestly, test channel change consistency. A British IPTV reseller UK with fast, consistent changes likely uses persistent connections. One with variable speed doesn't.
A British IPTV reseller who reuses connections respects that handshake overhead adds up. Persistent is faster than fresh.